Crop-specific Biotic Stress Management: Leveraging Cytogenetic Insights
Sanket Shinde *
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Lovely Professional University, Punjab 144411, India.
Suhel Mehandi
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Lovely Professional University, Punjab 144411, India.
Sampada Wakte
Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Maharashtra, Rahuri 413722, India.
Derlin T.
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Lovely Professional University, Punjab 144411, India.
Wagh. A. M.
Department of Horticulture, Lovely Professional University, Punjab 144411, India.
Niharika Eligeti
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Lovely Professional University, Punjab 144411, India.
Abhimanyu Gheware
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Lovely Professional University, Punjab 144411, India.
Shivika Pareek
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Lovely Professional University, Punjab 144411, India.
Rajlakshmi Raut
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Lovely Professional University, Punjab 144411, India.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Biotic stresses pose significant challenges to global crop production, threatening food security and agricultural sustainability. Effective management of biotic stressors, including pathogens, pests, and weeds, is essential to mitigate yield losses and ensure crop productivity. Cytogenetics, a branch of genetics focusing on the study of chromosomes and their inheritance patterns, offers valuable insights and tools for understanding the genetic basis of biotic stress resistance in crops. In this review, we provide an overview of the applications of cytogenetics in biotic stress management, highlighting its role in elucidating genetic mechanisms of resistance, identifying molecular markers for breeding programs, and enhancing crop resilience to biotic stressors. For instance, drought tolerance mechanisms differ in wheat (Triticum aestivum) and rice (Oryza sativa), with wheat exhibiting higher osmotic adjustment through proline accumulation, whereas rice relies more on root plasticity and antioxidant enzyme activity. Similarly, heat stress responses in maize (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) highlight the role of heat shock proteins and photosynthetic efficiency under high-temperature conditions. By integrating cytogenetic techniques and methodologies used in cytogenetic analysis, including karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), chromosome banding techniques, microarray analysis, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) we can overcome this biotic stresses too. This review also addresses the challenges and limitations of cytogenetic approaches and discusses future research directions. By synthesizing advancements in cytogenetics and stress management, this article serves as a comprehensive resource for researchers, plant breeders, and agricultural stakeholders focused on sustainable crop production.
Keywords: Karyotyping, Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH), comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), Fluorescence-activated Cell Sorting (FACS), Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), chromosome banding techniques, microarray analysis, Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)