Main Article Content
In the present global climate change scenario, drought stress is the major threat to agriculture productivity and yield. Water stress leads to physiological, biochemical and molecular changes in the plants. Green gram (Vigna radiata L.) contains 23% protein and is widely used as a protein source in the diet. Seed germination and early seedling stages are more susceptible stages for drought. Pranic agriculture (PA) is an ancient agriculture method where energy as prana is applied to the crop during stress to enhance yield. A pilot study was carried out by imposing stress at seedling stage by with-holding water for 6 days and then re-watered and kept for recovery. Pranic treatment was given to the seedlings at the time of stress. Pranic treated seedling showed significantly (p< .001) higher shoot length (20.68 cm), root length (7.87 cm), Root/ Shoot ratio (0.38) leaf area (6.73 cm2) and seedling fresh weight (0.51 g), when compared with the control (19.06, 5.06, 0.27, 3.15 and 0.40) respectively. Pranic treatment also showed in overcoming stress effect and recovery. Root growth and leaf area reduction were found to be beneficial to combat drought stress and recovery. Pranic treated seedling showed better plant growth, survival and recovery as compared to control seedlings. PA may help to over-come drought and other abiotic stress problems in agriculture. Further field investigations and exact stress management mechanism involved need to be studied.
Arrizabalaga‐Arriazu M, Morales F, Irigoyen JJ, Hilbert G, Pascual I. Growth and physiology of four Vitis vinifera L. cv. Tempranillo clones under future warming and water deficit regimes. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research. Accepted article in Press; 2021.
Fang Y, Xiong L. General mechanisms of drought response and their application in drought resistance improvement in plants. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2015;72:673–689.
Patil A, Tiwari KN. Yield assessment, N uptake and KC development of green gram crop during wet season of India. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 2021; 67(3):313-328.
Sui CK. The ancient science and art of pranic healing (3rd ed.). Manila: PH: Institute for Inner Studies Publishing Foundation, Inc; 2015.
Rastogi R, Saxena M, Chaturvedi DK, Gupta M, Rastogi AR, Rastogi M, Sagar S. Kirlian Experimental Analysis and IoT: Part 1. International Journal of Reliable and Quality E-Healthcare (IJRQEH). 2021; 10(2):29-43.
Prasad KN, Jois SN. Enhancement of Papaya (Carica papaya) Seedling Growth by Pranic Agriculture. AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science. 2020;42(1):191–196.
Poornima R, Prasad N, Yathindra HA, Srikanth NJ. Influence of Pranic Agriculture as a complementary treatment on yield, and RAPD polymorphism in cabbage (Brassica oleraceae L.) Plant Cell Biotechnology and Molecular Biology. 2021;22(33-34):265-273.
Astuti CP, Widyawati MN, Suryono S. Application Model of Pranic Healing Therapy for Emotional Stress Using Accurate Bio-Well GDV Camera. In E3S Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences. 2019; 125:05005.
Rajagopal R, Jois SN, Mallikarjuna Majgi S, Anil Kumar MN, Shashidhar HB. Amelioration of mild and moderate depression through Pranic Healing as adjuvant therapy: Randomised double-blind controlled trial. Australasian Psychiatry. 2018;26(1):82-87.
Nadig A, Nagaraja Jois S, Nagendra Prasad K, Vinu V. Amelioration of anxiety and locomotion during circadian rhythm change of adult zebrafish (Danio rerio) by Pranic Energy. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries. 2020;24(6):319-329.
Chen J, Qi T, Hu Z, Fan X, Zhu L, Iqbal MF, et al. OsNAR2.1 Positively Regulates Drought Tolerance and Grain Yield Under Drought Stress Conditions in Rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2019;10:197.
Zhang JH, Han HY, Lei YK, Yang WB, Li YH, Yang DF, et al. Correlations between distribution characteristics of Artemisia ordosica root system and soil moisture under different fixation stage of sand dunes. J. Southwest Forest. Univ. 2012;6: 1–5.
Yang, D., Liu, Y., Cheng, H. et al. Genetic dissection of flag leaf morphology in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under diverse water regimes. BMC Genet. 2016;17:94.
Cal AJ, Sanciangco M, Rebolledo MC, Luquet D, Torres RO, McNally KL, Henry A. Leaf morphology, rather than plant water status, underlies genetic variation of rice leaf rolling under drought. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2019;42(5):1532-1544.
Dias PC, WL. Araujo GA, Moraes BK, Barros RS, Da Matta FM. Morphological and physiological responses of two coffee progenies to soil water availability. J. Plant Physiol. 2007;164:1639-1647.
Chiatante D, Di-Iorio A, Sciandra S, Stefania G, Mazzoleni S. Effect of drought and fire on root development in Quercus pubescens Willd. and Fraxinus ornus L. seedlings. J. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2006; 56(2):190-197.
Fathi A, Tari D. Effect of drought stress and its mechanism in plants. International Journal of Life Sciences. 2016;10(1):1-6.
Avramova V, Abd Elgawad H, Zhang Z, Fotschki B, Casadevall R, Vergauwen L, et al. Drought induces distinct growth response, protection and recovery mechanisms in the maize leaf growth zone. Plant Physiol. 2015;169:1382–1396.
Larkunthod P, Nounjan N, Siangliw JL, Toojinda T, Sanitchon J, Jongdee B, et al. Physiological responses under drought stress of improved drought-tolerant rice lines and their parents. Not Bot Horti Agrobo. 2018;46:679-687.
Bangar P, Chaudhury A, Tiwari B, Kumar S, Kumari R, Bhat KV. Morphophysiological and biochemical response of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] varieties at different developmental stages under drought stress. Turkish Journal of Biology. 2019; 43(1):58-69.