Main Article Content
This study investigated the impact of using Physics Education Technology (PhET) simulations in teaching Electromagnetism on the learners’ performance. Also, the study sort to establish the impact of using PhET simulations on the learners’ attitude towards Electromagnetism. The study was done on sixty-three 11th grade learners from Kantanshi Secondary School in Mufulira District of Zambia. Two intact grade-11 classes classes were randomly selected for this study. Then the two classes were randomly assigned to the experimental and the control groups respectively. A non-equivalent group pre-test, post-test quasi-experimental research design was used. The experimental group (N = 33) and the control group (N = 30) were taught the topic of Electromagnetism using PhET simulations and the traditional lecture method respectively. The collected data were analysed using t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests in SPSS version 20. The findings of the research were that; the use of PhET simulations had a significant positive impact on the learners’ performance in Electromagnetism (i.e. t = 3.253 ; df = 61 ; p = 0.002). PhET simulations equally had a significant positive impact on the learner’s attitude towards Electromagnetism (i.e. U = 378.0; p = 0.050 ). Therefore, the study recommends the use of PhET simulations rather than the traditional lecture method in teaching electromagnetism.
ECZ. 2014 Examinations Performance Report. Lusaka: ECZ; 2015.
ECZ. 2005 Examinations Performance Report. Lusaka: ECZ; 2005.
ECZ. 2009 Examinations Performance Report. Lusaka: ECZ; 2009.
ECZ. 2013 Examinations Performance Report. Lusaka: ECZ; 2013.
Mansor R, Halim L, Osman K. Teachers’ knowledge that promotes students’ conceptual understanding. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010;9:1835-1839.
Perkins KK, Loeblein PJ, Dessau KL. SIMS for science: Powerful tools to support inquiry-based teaching. The Science Teacher. 2010;77(7):46-71.
Eckhardt M, Urhahne D, Conrad O, Harms U. How effective is instructional support for learning with computer simulations? Instructional Science. 2013;41(1):105-124.
Brunsell E, Horejsi M. Science 2.0. The Science Teacher. 2012;79(4):10.
Blake C, Scanlon E. Reconsidering simulations in science education at a distance: Features of effective use. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2007;23(6):491-502.
Wise KC, McKenzie DL. Simulations in the science classroom. JSTOR. 1986;9(4):14- 15.
Jimoyiannis A, Komis V. Computer simulations in physics teaching and learning: A case study on students' understanding of trajectory motion. Computer & Education. 2001;36(2):183-204.
Alrsa'i MS, Aldhamit YA. The effect of computer simulation on Al-Hussein Bin Talal University student's understanding of electricity and magnetism concepts and their attitude towards physic learning. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology. 2014;5(1):54-60.
Dori YJ, Belcher J. How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students' understanding of electromagnetism concepts? The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2005;14(2):243-279.
Adams WK. Students engagement and learning with PhET interactive simulations. Online First; 2010.
Basaraba KR. What are the effects of computer simulations on students' conceptual understanding on Newtonian mechanics? 2012.
Weiman CE, Adams WK, Perkins KK. PhET: Simulations that enhance learning. Education Forum. 2008;322.
Jia Q. A brief study on the implications of constructivism teaching theory on classroom teaching reform in basic education. International Education Studies. 2010;2(2).
Vygotsky LS. Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978.
Newcombe NS. Thinking spatially in the science classroom. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 2016;10:1-6.
Bindu C. Impact of ICT on teaching and learning: A literature review. International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations. 2016;4(1):24-31.
Bozkurta E, Ilika A. The effect of computer simulations over students’ beliefs on physics. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010;2(2010):4587–4591.